Hình minh hoạ: 789WIN

The First Months: From Chaos to Competence

The most striking change came immediately. Forest stopped giving away soft goals. In Nuno’s first six league matches, they conceded only four goals, and two of those came in a 3–1 defeat at Manchester United where the scoreline flattered the hosts. The defence, previously a confusion of man-marking pairing and inverted full-backs, became a simple back four with clear roles. Murillo began to look like the ball-playing centre-back that had attracted interest from Barcelona, and the midfield duo of Danilo and Nicolas Domínguez provided a shield that had been missing since the early weeks of the campaign.

In attack, Nuno did something many pundits had called for during Cooper’s final weeks: he stopped forcing Anthony Elanga to play a rigid defensive role. Instead, Elanga was given permission to stay high on the right touchline, waiting for the long diagonal switch that had been a trademark of Nuno’s Wolves. The results were immediate – Elanga registered three assists in his first eight matches under the new coach, and the partnership between him and Taiwo Awoniyi began to resemble a functional, if not spectacular, counter-attacking unit.

By the end of February, Forest had climbed to 15th place. The underlying numbers were still not healthy – they ranked among the bottom five for expected goals – but Nuno’s side were winning matches by narrow margins. The 1–0 victories over Sheffield United and Everton felt like the kind of results that only teams with a strong collective spirit grind out. Players who had looked lost under the pressure of a relegation battle suddenly understood exactly what their manager demanded of them off the ball.

Where Nuno Confounded His Critics

One of the most persistent criticisms of Nuno Espírito Santo is that his football is too defensive, too reactive, and ultimately limited. That assessment, once fair during the final months at Tottenham Hotspur, was not representative of what he built at the City Ground. Forest’s midfield shape, especially away from home, was deeply conservative. But against teams in the bottom half, Nuno showed a willingness to press high and commit numbers forward. The 3–1 victory at Newcastle United in April was not an accident – it involved a disciplined high line and repeated vertical passes into the channels, a plan that exploited Newcastle’s aggressive full-backs.

Critics also point to his record in big matches. Yet Forest took four points from their two meetings with Manchester City, and the 1–0 home win over Liverpool at the end of the season was a tactical masterclass in managing a game with ten men for half an hour. Nuno set his side up in a mid-block, denied Liverpool the centre of the pitch, and then sprang through Callum Hudson-Odoi to produce the match-winning goal. That performance was not just about grit; it was a demonstration that the coach could adapt his structure to the opponent’s weaknesses in real time.

Perhaps the most significant counterargument to the “negative Nuno” narrative came from the players themselves. In interviews, several squad members – including Murillo and Morgan Gibbs-White – spoke privately and publicly about how clearly the coaching staff communicated their responsibilities. After Cooper, whose methods were more intuitive and emotionally driven, the players appreciated the repetition and clarity of Nuno’s sessions. This did not always translate into expansive football, but it created trust. For a club that had lost its way, trust was a valuable currency.

The Constraints That Remain

It would be dishonest to claim that the move was an unqualified success. Forest’s attacking metrics remained poor throughout Nuno’s first half-season. The reliance on individual moments from Hudson-Odoi, Elanga or Chris Wood made the team vulnerable when those players were not involved in the game. Against deep sitting opponents, Forest often lacked a coherent positional plan to break them down. The 1–1 home draw against Luton Town in March was a painful reminder that the squad still did not know how to dominate possession against weaker teams.

The summer transfer window added to the feeling of an unfinished project. Forest signed a dozen players again, and Nuno’s influence over recruitment was less than his public supporters suggested. The loss of Orel Mangala in the same window, and the failure to sign a genuine number eight, left the midfield short of creativity for the early part of the following season. Nuno has always been a coach who prefers to work with a small, trusted group. Nottingham Forest’s ownership, by contrast, has consistently built the squad through volume rather than precision. That tension did not disappear when the contract was signed.

And then there is the question of tactical resilience over a full season. Nuno’s Wolves side faded in his final year, and his Al-Ittihad project collapsed spectacularly. Forest’s 2024–25 campaign, played under the weight of Premier League spending rules, tested whether the coach could sustain intensity when the squad was stripped of key players. The early results of that season suggested that the core issues remain: Nuno’s system depends heavily on the fitness of his first-choice wingers and strikers, and when those players are missing, there is no obvious plan B.

How the History Will Judge the Appointment

The most important perspective is that of Nottingham Forest supporters. They watched Steve Cooper – the manager who had ended their 23-year exile from the Premier League – dismissed with genuine sadness. Nuno had the unenviable task of replacing a beloved figure. That he was able to win over the majority of the fanbase is not due to tactical sophistication or warm personal charm. It was due to results. A club that had become accustomed to preparing for the Championship again suddenly found itself looking upwards, with a team that had become genuinely difficult to beat.

The history will not remember Nuno Espírito Santo as the architect of a glorious new era at Forest. He is more likely to be seen as the steady hand that reorganised the furniture after Cooper had let the air in. That does not mean the appointment lacked ambition. Sometimes ambition is mistaken for a big name or an attacking philosophy. In the brutally pragmatic business of Premier League survival, ambition is staying up comfortably enough to build toward something else. Nuno did exactly that.

The deeper question is whether the board’s decision to bring him in can be separated from the wider structural chaos around the club. If Marinakis continues to sign twenty players every summer, if sporting directors change as often as managers, then no coach – no matter how talented – can establish a lasting identity. Nuno survived his first full season. He might survive a second. But the conditions that made his appointment necessary were not of his making, and they will not be fixed by him alone.

Final Verdict: The Right Call at the Right Moment

After weighing the evidence, the conclusion I reach is that Nottingham Forest’s decision to appoint Nuno Espírito Santo was correct. It was not the most glamorous choice, and it did not satisfy those who wanted a manager to turn the club into a front-foot attacking side overnight. But the immediate context demanded a coach who could bring order out of chaos, and Nuno’s career has repeatedly shown that he is at his best in exactly those circumstances.

The same qualities that made him a success at Wolves – clear block defending, disciplined midfield positioning, ruthless efficiency on the break – were precisely the qualities that could rescue a squad drowning in confused tactical instructions. He restored the basics. He made Forest compact. He gave the players a simple grid of meaning in which to operate. And he made them competitive again when their confidence was at its lowest ebb.

What happens next is not guaranteed. Nuno’s career shows a tendency toward burnout in the third season, and Forest’s ownership model does not seem designed for long-term stability. But no appointment in modern football comes with guarantees. What a club can look for is a manager whose immediate strengths correspond to the immediate need. In December 2023, Nottingham Forest needed calm, discipline, defensive structure and the wisdom of a Premier League survivor. Nuno Espírito Santo brought all of that to the City Ground. For a team staring at relegation, that was not a choice between ambition and safety. It was the definition of safety earned through ambition.

As the season’s pages turn into years, this will be remembered as the moment Forest steadied themselves. They did not find a revolutionary. They found a pragmatist with principles. And in the wild, unsettled environment of Nottingham Forest’s recent history, that may have been the most valuable asset of all. Readers interested can find more about bài cào 789WIN.